FaceLock vs Alternatives

See how FaceLock compares to traditional PKI, mobile driver's licenses, and physical ID cards

Feature Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of FaceLock and alternative credential systems

Feature FaceLock Traditional PKIMobile Driver's LicensePhysical ID Cards
Offline Verification Complete Requires validation Limited Visual only
Biometric Binding Face-sealed Device-bound only Device dependent None
Fraud Resistance iBeta L1/L2 Device compromise Device theft risk Counterfeiting
Universal Access Any smartphone Specific apps Specific apps Visual inspection
Privacy Protection Zero data collection Tracking possible Data harvesting No digital trace
Cross-Medium Support Digital & printed Digital only Digital only Printed only

When to Choose FaceLock

Choose FaceLock When:

  • You need offline verification capability
  • Biometric binding is critical for security
  • Universal accessibility is required
  • Privacy-first approach is essential
  • Both digital and printed credentials are needed

Cost Comparison (TCO)

FaceLock

  • ✓ Eliminates help desk support calls
  • ✓ Reduces fraud remediation costs
  • ✓ No infrastructure maintenance
  • ✓ Offline capability reduces operational costs

Traditional Systems

  • ✗ Ongoing help desk support
  • ✗ Fraud remediation expenses
  • ✗ Infrastructure maintenance
  • ✗ Network dependencies

Switching to FaceLock

Migrating from traditional credential systems to FaceLock is straightforward. Our implementation team provides comprehensive support including:

  • ✓ Phased migration approach starting with pilot programs
  • ✓ Integration with existing systems and workflows
  • ✓ Staff training and change management support
  • ✓ Ongoing technical assistance and optimization

Most organizations start with a pilot program (1,000-5,000 credentials) before full-scale deployment, allowing for evaluation and refinement.

Ready to Make the Switch?

Start your pilot program and see how FaceLock compares to your current system